Beijing Statement

Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary in the LAWASIA region


The Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary finds its origins in 1982 in a statement of principles formulated by the Law Association for Asia and the Pacific (LAWASIA) Human Rights Standing Committee and a small number of Chief Justices and other Judges at a meeting in Tokyo (“the Tokyo Principles”). The decision to formulate the current Statement was made at the 4th Conference of Chief Justices of Asia and the Pacific in Perth, Western Australia in 1991. The Secretary of the LAWASIA Judicial Section, The Honourable Justice R D Nicholson, and I undertook the drafting of the Statement, a first draft of which was presented to the 5th Conference in Colombo, Sri Lanka, in 1993. In light of comments received at that conference and subsequently, and following further consideration at the conference in Beijing in August 1995, the Statement of Principles was adopted by the Chief Justices from 20 countries in the Asia Pacific. A revised version of the Statement as it is presented here was adopted in its final form at the 7th Conference of the Chief Justices in Manila in August 1997. The Statement has now been signed and subscribed to by 32 countries in the Asia Pacific region.


The Statement is a tribute to the determination of all signatories to leave aside differences in both legal and social traditions to formulate a single Statement on the Independence of the Judiciary.


Crafting a Legal Remedy for India’s Cybercrime Crisis

With the pace of digital transforma…

Read more

Training the Next Generation of Ukrainian Lawyers

As the war in Ukraine grinds on, in…

Read more

Training Indian Judges to Tackle Human Trafficking

The numbers are staggering. Every d…

Read more

Defending Judicial Independence in the EU

Legal scholars have watched with al…

Read more

Welcoming the 5 AM coalition from Ukraine

“It was five o’clock in the…

Read more

Empowering the Judicial Exchange Network – Measuring 10 Years of Impact and Effectiveness

In October 2012, the CEELI Institut…

Read more

The CEELI Institute Partners with the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs

In September 2022, the CEELI Instit…

Read more

Preparing Young Ukrainian Lawyers to Deliver Justice

Before Russia’s full-scale invasi…

Read more

Launch of the INNOCENT Project

We are delighted to kick off our IN…

Read more

Tips for Judges for Case Management

  The document is relevant to any individual judge who is active on social media as well…

Read more

Manual on Independence, Impartiality, and Integrity of Justice

    acrylic wifi professional crack airserver crack adobe indesign crack bendy and …

Read more

Our Statement Regarding the Russian Federation's Decision to List the CEELI Institute as an "Undesirable Organisation"

15 July 2022 The CEELI Institute is…

Read more

Practical Guidelines for Remote Judging

The CEELI Institute supports judiciaries as they manage their pandemic response and their adj…

Read more

The Villa Grébovka Celebrates 150 Years: 1871–2021

Up Close and Personal with the Vill…

Read more

CEELI joins with IFES in Producing New Anti-Corruption Tools

The CEELI Institute was delighted …

Read more